eDNA tells you an organism's genetic material was somewhere in the system at some point. Environmental RNA tells you an organism is alive, metabolically active, and here now. RNA begins degrading within minutes to hours of leaving a living cell, and that fragility is exactly what makes it informative: a positive eRNA signal is far less likely to come from a long-dead cell or from water that drifted in last week.
It also means eRNA cannot be collected the way eDNA is. Valid eRNA sampling requires high-volume pumped filtration to concentrate enough viable transcript signal, and immediate on-site chemical preservation to lock the snapshot before it breaks down. That is what the Osprey platform, supplied by our genomics partner, is built to do.
Live Census reads the whole active community by metabarcoding. It is best used as the second step, not the first: to interpret a Lake Census, to check a lake's living response to a bloom or a management action, or to confirm whether what a census found is actually alive.
Sold in sets of three. Three sampling locations is the minimum order, for the same reason it is on the Lake Census — one point is not a picture of a lake. You keep the raw sequence files, archived and reprocessable as reference libraries improve.
One of four genetic tests. “Census” reads the whole community; “Watch” looks for one named species. Lake Census and Species Watch read DNA; the two “Live” tests read RNA, which only living, active organisms produce.
-
Lake Census — DNA, broad: what lives here?
-
Species Watch — DNA, one species: is it here yet?
-
Live Census — RNA, broad: what is alive and active right now?
-
Live Watch — RNA, one species: is it alive and active here now?
Most lakes should start broad and narrow down: census first, then watch, then confirm. Which genetic test should your lake start with?
Note on methodology: eRNA analysis is not an EPA-approved method. It is a research-grade ecological tool, and results are not suitable for regulatory or compliance use.